“Imagination will
often carry us to worlds that never were, but without it we go nowhere.”
-
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist
-
Ken Robinson, education philosopher
A maxim in the world of applied creativity, attributed to
Linus Pauling, is that “The best way to get a good idea is to have a lot of
ideas.”
Steve Grossman thinks that’s the worst thing you can do.
Cultural Studies colleague Steve Grossman has been working
and consulting in applied creativity for decades. To the practice of consulting he brings far more than getting to original answers to solve inveterate problems. He has spent his time with industrial
clients in thinking carefully and consistently about the care and feeding of
ideas—how to conceive and nurture them.
And surprising, also, how to kill them off when they aren’t serving a
creative cause.
As a result, Steve finds that he must constantly
differentiate between the act of imagination and the act of true
creativity. When people talk
enthusiastically about the wonders of being creative (how good it makes them
feel, for example, to be in that elite league of the “creatives,”) his habit is
to put up his hand in warning and caution them that “You mean that you are
imaginative; that’s far different than being creative.” Because creativity is more than generating
free-form ideas, loosely connected, or vaguely envisioned. It is finding brilliant solutions to problems
– from small to overwhelming, from the annoying to the intractable. Or in
inventing whole new ideas from which thousands of others can spring.
This purposeful solution-finding means allocating time and
focus and attention to cultivating “imagination with purpose.” Rather than spending energy and attention on
what is beyond our control, we can, with the right focus and knowledge, shift
our energy to what can be created.
Inspirational writer Roy T. Bennett notes that “Change begins at the end
of your comfort zone.”
Allocation of effort means doing more thoughtful perceiving,
and noting where you are in the domain of ideas in the process of doing that. At its core, Grossman says, creativity is “much
less a generative act and far more an act of recognition.” The recognition skill “lies in the ability to
look at something apparently unrelated to a problem and discover there an
exciting connecting pathway to a solution.”
And here we come to the killing-off phase. This is difficult to countenance because
ideas are difficult to come up with and work out; they seem too heavy an
emotional and labor investment to just jettison. But this is exactly the reason we have
long-term unsolved problems, he claims: we keep trying to find our keys over
and over in the places where things are easiest to find: out in the open, under
a streetlight, or by the door—those places where we most commonly leave
them. The stroke of genius is to start
looking in unexpected places more difficult to navigate and not as well lit –
the garage, the back of the sock drawer, next to the curb, even in the
trash. By extinguishing (mentally roping
off) the familiar and easy terrain where people are accustomed to thinking and
operating, we open the mind and fancy to new hunting grounds where completely
novel ideas have a chance of being recognized and taking hold of the
imagination in the form of unexpected answers to long-term problems.
So first: kill off old ideas. Why? So that the nonsense, irrelevant,
stupid, crazy, impossible notions have a different place to land and take root,
instead of rehashing the same old list of ineffective ones. Extinction is the
first phase of Darwin’s process of evolution, followed by mutation and
selection (survival), as the basis for new idea finding and deployment.
Creativity expert Robert Weisberg has said that novel
solutions arrive as we move further away from the very concept of the problem
we started with, and that withdrawal or extinction process begins with negative
feedback about our first inadequate moves to solve that problem. In other words, in order to come up with
better ideas, the first batch must die off, and quickly.
Extinction is absolutely essential to moving forward to
ideas that will actually work. But much
group creativity, especially, is tied into simply trying to generate tons of
ideas and then to somehow prioritize these simply by how attractive they appear
out of the gate as potential solutions. When
such ideas are selected with sticky colored dots, put to work as implemented
projects, and then fail to solve the initial problem, people are at a loss to
explain why--or to come up with a next generation of very different ideas,
because it feels like starting over. But, as it turns out, admitting defeat is
exactly the new opening move needed to go forward.
Assumption reversal
There is now far more work waiting even once lame ideas are
dismissed. Once they can concede defeat,
the problem-solvers can then begin the next phase of assumption reversal, a
concept Steve has been credited for. In
this process, primal assumptions are tested by asking the question: “What beliefs are we acting on that we assume
are so carved in stone that there is no way to even question them?” Hard to do,
or even think about, because underlying pre-assumptions are always concealed
beneath our conscious radar – we don’t even know we are making them. This is the essential feature of all
cultures, which over the course of long histories of commonly accepted beliefs,
act as shared social contracts to honor basic truths about the world and social
relations. Cultural assumptions build
mental castles difficult to find our way around and even harder to update,
change, or challenge.
However, once an assumption is reversed--the idea behind it
challenged and nullified for the purposes of the extinction exercise--huge new domains
are opened up and available for exploration.
At GEON, makers of Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC), the work group questioned
the truth value of “coffins are used to bury people” to open their
manufacturing up to plastic pet coffins.
They had been stuck on the horrifying notion of burying people in
plastic; once liberated from that construct, they were suddenly able to see the
application to pets rather than people. Actually,
the growing appeal of cremation challenges the Western taboo against burning
bodies—when the burning is contained and sanctified. An interesting new burial product is Irish home
soil imported to the US designed for its large ethnic population. The idea is to mix the soil of the mother
country with the ashes, or inter in the coffin or grave. The effect, of course, is to be
metaphorically buried in ancestral ground.
Getting to applied
Creativity is imagination purposefully and productively
applied. Getting to applied separates
the intuitive act of imagination from the more demanding rigor of shaping up
ideas into recognizable working solutions: first, under a clear definition of
the process, then using tools and techniques to make the outputs of imagination
real. This is the mentality behind the
magic.
Now the question to shape the future: How many fixed assumptions are we making as problem-solvers,
creators, or designers that just aren’t necessary or even true? How can venturing outside the lines, then
reversing assumptions, change the course of everyday thinking by a
block-busting invention or intervention?
Website for Steve Grossman:
http://www.cruisingtoaha.com
Oh. My. God! Exploration of Assumption - brilliant concept!
ReplyDeleteAnd frankly, I fully embrace this (finally-made) distinction between "Creative" and "Imaginative".... FAR too many think they are Creatives when what they possess is an active imagination...